Get each enterprise customer through security review and live on the date you signed
Every enterprise customer brings a security review, a new integration and data your agent hasn’t seen. We produce the evidence their security team asks for and do the engineering, under your name.
From choosing a vendor to go-live
- Vendor chosen
- Security review39% of software buyers named it the biggest delay after choosing a vendor, as did 50% of enterprise buyers
- Contract signed
- Integration and go-liveTheir CRM, tickets, billing and identity, with evals on their data before the switch
Where customer go-lives stall
First at the security review, before the contract is signed. In G2’s survey of software buyers, IT security review was the biggest single delay once a buyer had chosen a vendor, named by 39% overall and 50% among enterprise buyers (G2, 22 July 2026). Our guide to the AI vendor security questionnaire lists what those reviews ask about agents and how to answer.
Then at go-live, when your agent meets the customer’s own data. Evals that pass on your demo data say little about a customer’s invoices, tickets and edge cases. Your deployment team can only run so many go-lives at once. And a customer’s procurement team will ask what happens when your engineers leave. In a release of 29 September 2026, Gartner advised software engineering leaders to make deliverables, knowledge transfer, IP rights and exit part of the contract (Gartner). Our contracts include all four.
Two ways we work with vendors
A production readiness review on one customer deployment
We spend ten working days on the deployment that worries you most. You get an eval suite built from that customer’s failures, a review of every tool and MCP connection, and a written verdict, for USD 10,000.
Forward deployed engineers under your name
Engineers you approve by name join your deployment team, use your email domain and follow your process, working your customers’ hours. USD 12,000 per engineer per month, against the costs in our forward deployed engineer cost guide.
What your customer’s security team can be shown
- A page for every connection
The credential each tool uses, its scopes compared with what the tool needs, whether tokens pass through to other APIs, and the prompt-injection paths we tested. Checked against the MCP security best practices (2026-07-28) and the OWASP Top 10 lists for LLM applications (2026 edition) and agentic applications.
- Eval results on their data
Pass rates per failure class against thresholds agreed before the run, with the suite in a repository they can run themselves.
- A verdict with owners
Go, go with conditions or no-go, and every remaining risk with a named owner. You decide what your customer sees, and nothing goes to them from us directly.
The sample verdict shows the format with an invented company. A verdict is an independent test of one deployment, not a certification.
The rules we work by
- We don’t contract with your customers directly while we work for you, or for 12 months after.
- We don’t name you or your customers anywhere without written permission.
- Code and documents are assigned to you.
- We don’t use your data or your customers’ data to train models.
Who this fits
Vendors at seed to Series B whose deployment team is the bottleneck, with deals signed and go-live dates slipping. If you sell to banks or insurers, read security and data first. We don’t yet hold SOC 2 or ISO 27001, and some regulated buyers require one of them from every subcontractor.
Tell us which customer go-live is slipping
Tell us the customer’s systems and the date they expect. We reply within one working day.